There is a story of Helen Keller who became deaf & blind as an infant, and consequently speechless, and perceived herself in those days, in her own words, as “less than an animal”.
Through training and perseverance she learnt about words, concepts and eventually language too, when she finally made the association between words being scratched on her one hand by her governess and the idea of water while it was being simultaneously poured on the other.
Apparently the same scratch marks had been used for standing water earlier in the day, and she was at first confused when presented with running water yet using the same scratched word.
The realization that a word as concept, could embrace two different expressions of water sparked such an epiphany in her, it was as though a dam burst and from that day forth she blossomed into the legend that she became, and a worldwide master communicator.
It is fascinating that it took the element of water to open Helen’s floodgates of communication for much deeper reasons that tie into the creation of Life itself.
Water is how our entire world manifests living Beings, and in Tantra-Yoga water is fundamental to how we communicate with each other through our bodies as the vehicle for self-expression.
When water is honored it frees up all boundaries, but when abused it creates room for conflict and communications is distorted or even ceases.
Without proper communication there is only disharmony.
It is fair to say that Language is a key factor to being Human, for it is our ability to communicate with others that lets us establish relationships with the world around us, and from such interactions to discover Meaning.
The art of Etymology is about delving into the linguistic roots of words, to surface their deeper meaning and also helps us to be more precise in our expression, which is especially helpful when we are talking about a very subtle topic like the Mind.
The word liberate means to be free, so to deliberate means to box it in, or pin it down, so we can look at it carefully.
The word Meaning is related to the Sanskrit मन Man (pronounced Mu(h)na), just like it is related to Mind.
That is, the Mind logically organizes its Mental concepts such that their Meaning is a shared understanding of any situation.
When we express our Mental concepts to others and are able to establish a shared Meaning, then we say there is shared understanding, for there is an awareness of the underlying basis on which our expression stands.
Understand?
Understanding the depth of the word “understand” is really the start of understanding our whole journey.
It is useful to separate out the two domains in which Meaning is used:
As a utility to extract understanding in material reality
As a means to surface deeper understanding in psychological reality
Meaning as a Utility
The utilitarian aspect of meaning is when it’s possible to communicate objective facts about the world around us without having to do deal with subjective bias.
For example:
we see a table and we explore its physical contours,
we examine how it could be used in a variety of ways depending on the context,
maybe it could be used to stand on top of, but
that could depend on the weight of the person and
the stability of the ground underneath.
At a very obvious level this allows for language translation to automate basic communications by extracting the meaning of words, and even allowing for some contextual depth.
Meaning as a Means
We deliberately used the word “means” to indicate when understanding meaning maybe confusing.
When words are loaded with subjective bias then we cannot mechanically extract meaning because the context could be far more elaborate.
For example, if we suggest that a table will not be able to stand someone’s weight:
Is it our Intent to share with them subtly that they are “fat” ?
In more impoverished cultures this is a sign of respect, but
in industrial societies is a mark of shame for poor lifestyle choices.
Is there a specific Purpose to start a deeper discussion that
the trade of carpentry has deteriorated with the mass availability of cheap furniture so let’s just somehow repackage the shoddy unit and dump it on someone else in some online auction site?
In this deeper example the need to establish a shared understanding is about a complex subjective situation where meaning has to be surfaced with attention to psychological subtleties.
This deeper aspect of Meaning is all around us, in every aspect of Life.
The word for language comes from the Latin lingua meaning tongue, and we mostly use the word language in a Human context.
We could also use the word “language” in a much broader context, as in any logical means of expression where a tongue is not even necessary.
For example, dolphins have an intrinsic ability to meaningfully express themselves sonically, or trees meaningfully express themselves (albeit very slowly) through their seeds & fruits etc., or body language driven by the logic of internal chemical reactions, or a computer language.
Maybe even the entire Earth as a conscious Being is expressing herself in a scale that is hard to comprehend.
And could the ultimate scientific theory be that Meaning, along with Energy & Matter, underlies the entire Universe itself, and thus the Universe itself has a language?
Life is a story well worth exploring.
Mind is known for telling stories, being a prankster, monkeying around, hiding things, unexpectedly showing up, and thankfully even being tamed into order and discipline when needed.
A “Story” usually indicates an entertaining tale but Life becomes far more interesting when there is a deeper meaning which is surfaced, possibly tying our own story with that of the Universe’s itself!.
This need to establish Meaning is a fundamental need for Humans and possibly all life forms - what is our purpose in Life, why are we here, what is the Universe, what role do we play in it, why are we in our current situation, etc. etc.
Endless questions arise, all stemming from this core need for establishing Meaning.
After all, if the Universe has Meaning, then surely our own personal existence too should have Meaning - we would just need to surface it!
In other words, we can even state that Life itself exists to surface the Meaning of the Universe.
Does this mean:
If something is Meaningful to us does it have Life?
Does the mere projection of our Mind into an external object fill it with Meaning ?
Is it but our Mind which is projecting that the Universe itself has Meaning?
This quest for Meaning stems from an inherent curiosity about Life - maybe it’s our DNA particles of Life expressing themselves, or at a more basic level it is the trail of atomic breadcrumbs that indicate our origins from explosions in the stars!
This is not a book on the physical or biological sciences, it is purely about psychology, so we are really looking at symbolic meaning here.
From our perspective these deep Life Stories are essentially networks of symbolic meanings.
When we uncover the hidden meanings of this symbolic network, together, we achieve shared understanding with other conscious Beings, like a shared Treasure hunt through the forest of Life.
When all these meanings from this symbolic network click into place coherently in the Mindscape this is when we have the Avatār effect, and when it happens to the entire group we get the superhero we need for our times!
This is our Theory.
The word Theory comes from the Greek Theoria - a way of presenting our perspective of the world like in a Theater production where consciously crafted characters are presented on the stage of Life by the Rishi as writer/director.
This Theater is our Mindscape.
Our Theory is that when conscious Beings are willed into Life in our Mindscape in a coherent manner, then we are empowered with the Avatār effect which elevates our entire existence to a different plane of empowerment.
This rich and deep capability of the Mind as Storyteller has unfortunately been underutilized because of the mechanization of our Mind’s capabilities where all Meaning is reduced to mere Utilitarian value.
When all Meaning is reduced to mere Utility, without any depth to its Intent or Purpose, then that is but Storytelling functioning as a mere clockwork mechanism which turns us into automatons.
The word myth from the Greek mythos, in common parlance means something “cooked up that’s likely not true”, but its original meaning was merely a “narrated story”.
Unfortunately marauding cultures got fixated on trying to ascertain mere surface meaning of these myths and thus lost their likely deeper meanings.
Such myths, whether from the Greek or Hindu cultures, actually describe universally applicable life stories where the underlying psychological themes are common across all of human experience.
We therefore refer to myths as legendary tales, or epics, in order to create a feeling of awe in the listener that these amazing tales may have actually happened, and this sense of wonder opens up the Mind to the larger possibilities of life.
When we get too deep into Language we could easily be accused of getting lost in the weeds of semantics, nitpicking on minute differences in interpretations, and generally losing out on the bigger picture.
This is a common refrain amongst those who observe Sanskrit grammarians, or in fact readers of any ancient texts, who are going about their lives with noses in their books, not participating in the actual dynamic processes of life unfolding around them.
Our intent though, is to firmly establish without any doubt the theory of the Mind as a Storyteller, and for this we have to understand the nuances of how we use Language.
Although all this may initially sound pedantic, rest assured the Storytelling part will become all the more meaningful and will reveal wave after wave of deep realizations.
When we don't have an appreciation for the nuances of Language and their effect on the Mind, our best stories never see the light of day, and stymied by progress, at best we can live as a mechanistic automaton.
The psychological woes of this industrialized society, with its mechanistic approach to Life, is what Yoga seeks to address.
The industrialized Human Mind disconnected from Nature has been essentially lobotomized of much of its sensitivity, unable to perceive the subtle processes of Life, whether within the body in which it is housed, or its extension into society, or its pervasiveness in Nature from whence it originates.
This is a direct consequence of treating the Mind as a programmable machine, dumbed down into an insentient automaton incapable of true Creativity, the essential ingredient of Life.
Such a Mind becomes insensitive to human relations, and to our relationship with Nature, and consequently we have breakdowns in society as well as in our natural environment.
And most egregious of all, we become insensitive to what lies within, which eventually leads to the most difficult of breakdowns, that of the self. Not a good idea.
Awareness of the nature of Thought can resolve this situation.
Thought is a faculty that has developed tremendous significance ever since human biological evolution resulted in our enlarged brain size.
Thought is best framed in the context of psychological Time.
Thought is:
created as a consequence of Thinking in the present,
gets stored as a memory, of assumptions & conclusions, in our past, and
projects itself an imagined future.
The etymology of the word Thought is unclear but there is an associated root in the Sanskrit word तत् "Thath", meaning That.
When we point something out as a separate object, “that” object is now a mental concept stored in the Mind as Thought.
The Sanskrit word तत् “Thath” in the Vedic literature, is a part of the most profound teachings which exhort us to not separate That from whom we actually are.
We are in fact That which we perceive as separate from us, or in other words,
तत्वमसि
Thath Thvam Asi
"That You Are" - enjoins the Veda
Everything we perceive is a reflection of who we Think we are, so, obviously, the more we clear the Mind clearer too is our perception of the world around us, and our perception of our own self.
The Mind is a nebulous thing, hard to pin down, but we can look at it from the perspective of Thought.
A simplified definition of the Mind, for now, is that it is a collection of Thoughts.
As we get deeper into Yoga structures of the Mind we will see there is a lot more we can embellish around how Thoughts are structured, but this is the core of it.
Understanding the Mind is thus equivalent to observing the essential nature of Thought.
Observing Thought though, is challenging, because it is usually in motion, like ripples, or even waves, on the surface of the ocean that continually rise, merge, and collapse, with hardly any structure that we can grasp.
Thought drives the state of the human body, and the human body in turn feeds into Thought, in one continuous cycle and as such there is no sharp line dividing Mind and the body.
For example, Thought results in the generation of certain chemical changes in the body, so a happy Thought creates endorphins,
which could cause us to think more happy Thoughts, or
carry out some bodily actions to reinforce the happy Thought.
Thus it is seen that Thought is the basis for the entire world we experience:
Our mental state of feelings & emotions,
the state of the physical body as a living bio-chemical factory, and
its outward expression in speech & motion.
Consequently this has a material impact on the world around us, and eventually feeds back through our sensory organs and back again into the brain as new Thoughts stored in memory,
The movement of Thought is fundamentally due to these two characteristics:
Reflexivity, and
Connectedness
When some situation is being presented to us, and we recognize it as being similar to one from the past, then Thought from these past memories kicks in almost instantaneously, just like a knee-jerk reflex.
Re-cognizing means that we are ‘again cognizing’, because there is some memory of a similar past situation and this past memory helps us to understand the new situation with less effort.
That is, at first a situation is presented in the im-mediate moment, i.e. not mediated by Thought, then very soon after it gets reflexively mediated by a Thought from the past.
This reflexivity is useful when, for example, we see a red traffic light while driving and we need to stop in a hurry, there is no time or even the necessity to explore what is the existential implication of a red traffic light!
But at other times this mediation by past Thought clouds our perception, such as situations that stir up emotions within us and impact our inner psychological state, thus preventing us from perceiving clearly.
Many Thoughts are also connected to one another because of logically shared aspects, so when there is one reflexive Thought then related Thoughts kick in, and thus is triggered a Thought stream, demonstrating this is no mere static memory bank, but one that is in near-perpetual motion.
For example, an image of some animal could remind us of fear, which in turn could bring up other fear-inducing Thoughts from the past that have affected us psychologically.
Or we could project some future scenario based on some incident that just happened, like we see a beautiful person and start planning how to make a deeper connection, and this brings up other similar situations in the Mind.
This return to a particular past or projecting about the future is literally endless in potential, as no Thought really stands alone, logically connected as they all are in a semantic network of meaningful constructs.
This reflexive & connected movement of Thought is efficient & rapid, and very useful as a utility to navigate a material world where things need to get done.
But in the psychological realm such chain reactions result in situations where the powerful workhorse of our Mind spins as though in auto-pilot, enslaved to its dynamic storehouse of Thoughts, which reactions happen even more intensely in stressful situations where we have not had the restraint to pause for a moment to reflect.
It is therefore useful to separate out the two domains in which Thought is used:
As a material utility
As a psychological tool
When we go through systematic training to acquire utilitarian facts or skills, then mechanical repetition to reinforce reflexivity is a useful utility to have at our fingertips.
For example:
When faced with a red traffic light the assumption is to not hit the brakes too hard if there is a car too close behind but if a human walks in front then to do so regardless of what's behind you.
When we perceive excessive heat in an object we jerk our hand away because we have a Thought based on past experience of the potential negative consequences of fire.
Note that each time we understand the assumptions behind the Thought it reinforces the correct set of conditions when the reflex ought to fire.
In an increasingly AI-driven world where machines are performing utilitarian tasks the value of mechanical repetition as a human skill will decrease over time, although it will always be essential for us to retain reflexive Thought as a utility.
However when it comes to psychology it is best to view Thought in a different way.
Intent and Purpose are two types of psychological Thought.
Intent
Intent, with a root sound related to the Sanskrit anthar which means internal, indicates a Thought with subtle origin.
We can say that Intent arises from the heart (a word which stems from Sanskrit हृद hrud), because the heart is a deeply internal region from where subtle Intent arises.
Purpose
Purpose is a word related to posing, and indicates a Thought that projects externally.
We can say that Purpose arises from our computer-like brain, an overt projection of will and passion, that operates on sheer logic and subtleties be damned.
From another perspective we can also say that Intent is "left brain" and Purpose is "right brain".
Although it’s tempting to think of Intent as an opposite of Purpose, in fact Intent manifests only when it has a seed of determined Purpose that pulls it along, and conversely Purpose works effectively when it has a seed of potential Intent pushing it forward.
Intent and Purpose are best pictured like in the classic Yin-Yang diagram .
It's interesting that although Intent is softer it nudges Purpose outwards, and although Purpose is outward focused it reaches inwards and pulls Intent along.
When both Intent and Purpose work fully together the manifestation is harmony.
For example, we can use Intent to create a healthy life being open to sensible guidance, and we can use Purpose to ensure that we get to Yoga class on time using an alarm clock.
In the world of AI, we will have our personal Life simulator projecting what could be our potential future, by understanding our Intent & tracking our Purpose, and with the use of AI-driven Augmented Reality hardware it could actually help us to psychologically evolve our mental states to manifest our desired reality.
Thought as a utility is the basis by which we live in material reality so there is a tendency for it be overused in every aspect of human endeavor, such as in the psychological domain which is our investigation here.
There are two ways in which both Intentional & Purposeful Thought could lock us in a mental prison:
Entanglement of Intent
Fragmentation by Purpose
Intent is a subtle Thought form and sees its manifestation in fuzzier outcomes, hopefully tangible, but not precisely defined other than realizing some aspect of an integrated holistic vision.
With fuzzy thinking, our Thought streams could eventually get entangled in each other, and the result is subtle paranoia.
“If I didn’t know I was paranoid, I would probably get suspicious.” - a T-shirt quote.
For example, when two people, in unavoidably close proximity, have Intents that are not clearly brought to the surface then their Thoughts could eventually become so entangled that there arises “suspicion” of who or what is the actual root cause of any conflict.
In the Psychic Beings section, drawing upon our penchant for Yoga stories, we refer to this phenomenon as a Rākshasa psychic virus.
To bring Intent clearly to the surface, it needs to be paired with a driving Purpose, like say a flowering creeper which is guided properly to form a shady bower instead of growing wildly allowing nests of pests to flourish within its darkened crevices.
Purpose is an overt Thought form and sees its manifestation in material outcomes, definitely tangible.
Purposeful Thought is useful in analytical thinking to reduce complex concepts into achievable or manageable chunks, such as, to:
take apart the world of matter so we can continue expanding human presence into the material Universe, or
dissect a psychological situation so we can better understand and work it out in detail - as we are doing here.
Typically this is initiated with a particular framework in Mind, which by definition is limited to the scope of the particular problem so that it is easy to analyze, which has a consequent by-product that whatever falls outside of the framework is fragmented away.
That is, fragmentation occurs when there is no attention paid to integration of our Thought streams into a holistic vision.
In the Psychic Beings section, drawing upon our penchant for Yoga stories, we refer to this phenomenon as an Asura psychic virus.
When our frameworks are designed for whatever Purpose maximizes reductionist outcomes without regard to the Whole, then our world is subject to Fragmentation, and the result is subtle schizophrenia.
“If I didn’t know I was schizo, I would probably go to pieces” - another T-shirt quote.
Reductionist thinking became the norm in Western models thanks to Descartes with his famous dictum “I Think therefore I Am”, and thus the rise of rationalism in the West, and eventually the Industrial revolution itself of which we are experiencing its consequences in more ways than one.
Reductionism is a machine-like model where we break the objective into manageable chunks that can be compartmentalized so as to optimize our Purpose very efficiently.
But when reductionism loses its connection to the Whole, fragmentation ensues, and the consequent incoherence, leads to potentially disastrous side-effects.
For example:
Workers have had their lives fragmented across work, family, health, friends, etc. stemming from the need to optimize productivity by treating these as disconnected areas of Life,
but this leads to increased stress as the whole Being of who we are does not show up in any of our areas of activity.
Earth has been fragmented into nation-states with hard lines and walls dividing populations,
whereas viewing these man-made divisions as "dotted lines," as semi-porous borders, could lead to a more compassionate approach to accommodate migrations in the event of disasters.
Populations have been fragmented across caste lines to serve colonizing powers and exploited by power-hungry politicians,
whereas viewing local tribal societies as the bedrock of social capital could have minimized the requirement for impersonal & inefficient centralized government, as tribal societies are well known for taking care of each other in well-knit socioeconomic webs.
Science has become fragmented across its various disciplines, for example in the health sciences where medical patients have to navigate a sea of specialists in multi-specialty hospitals,
whereas a traditionally holistic approach can provide integrated care with the entire patient, body & mind, as the focus.
Technology developers downstream to the Sciences are notoriously unable to consider the full picture before unleashing shiny new inventions into the world, such as:
the diffusion of nuclear energy into rogue hands, or
social networks that seek to forcefully divide the world on ideology instead of providing a inclusive platform to resolve differences.
Yoga too, ironically, has been fragmented into different types of Yoga, some of them even becoming marketing brands, so that the original integral unity of its model has been obscured and consequently its power has not reached the masses, let alone blooming into its fullest potential as we seek here.
To avoid fragmented outcomes, Purpose must be subtly guided with an inner Intent that brings in a certain flexibility to organically integrate the hard vision of Purpose into a holistic outcome.
Although with clear Thinking we may be able to uncover the downstream impact of certain Thoughts, the above examples clearly show how the stream of Thought could get entangled in conflicting Intent or run away from its Purpose.
We are unable to control the evolution of Thought because there is an underlying psychological conditioning that drives the Mind, and thus Thought streams take on a life of their own, like a perpetual-motion machine.
When Intent & Purpose are clearly understood by AI, its simulations will show us potential pitfalls when we have such psychological conditioning which could take our future into undesirable territories.
When Intent or Purpose is "pure", that is free of all externally imposed conditioning, then such Intent manifesting from the "heart", aligns well with the clear Purpose of the "mind", and indeed our desired future manifests and that too without any stress or other forms of collateral damage.
However, it is usually not the case that such Thought forms arise from pristine ground, and this is what is meant by mental conditioning.
Any "If-Then-Else" is called a Conditional, and is central to how all computers mechanically execute their logical programs as utilities.
When this is how our own Minds have been setup to operate, beyond utilitarian tasks, then psychological conditioning ensues.
When we "feel" something about an interaction with the world, then, although subjective, these feeling values could help us in making rapid, “intuitive”, decisions to fulfill our Intent.
For example, when we assign a feeling value to a:
book (“If it is fictional, then I like it”), then it becomes easier to scan book store shelves to hone in on which books could be appropriate, or
house (“If it is cold, then I don’t like such buildings”), then it becomes easier to real estate search for appropriate homes.
Because of the subjective nature of “feeling”, it is challenging to examine the assumptions behind our assignment of value, so each time we base new decisions on previous assignments of value to similar situations, and this assignment of value thus deepens the groove of our conditioning.
A good word for the feelings that result from such Intentional Thoughts would be felts, but this is a word not in common use.
Unexamined Intentions could have unintended consequences.
For example, if when we are not feeling happy in the house we chose to live in, but the real reason behind our choice was actually not the temperature but some other emotional reason that coincided with a cold building, then
A Thought could arise that we need to move houses so we start scanning beach-side real estate listings, which thought of escaping our unhappiness generates endorphins.
Endorphins, which, as an internally generated morphine are addictive, and thus eventually their desired effects wear down.
So we feel sad and this causes us to want to generate even more endorphins.
Soon this becomes an addictive spiral, and we may while away endless hours doing nothing but looking at real estate listings in sunny places.
Thus, Intentional Thought with unexamined assumptions could have unintended consequences in terms of a constant underlying sense of dissatisfaction, and thus too is a Rākshasa born.
When the value assigned based on feeling is felt deeply, such Thought evokes strong emotions and becomes a driving Purpose. Notice that e-motion could very well be energy-in-motion!
For example, Humans have to reach Mars, the rivers have to be cleaned, the CO2 and CH4 levels in the atmosphere have to be reduced, the coral reefs have to be restored - are all strong Purposes.
When pursuing such areas of endeavor our Purpose is non-negotiable, and any situation that reminds us of our Purpose creates a much deeper mental groove.
Thought based on Purpose works fine as long as its core assumptions helps us to live an integrated Life, else fragmentation inevitably ensues.
For example, fragmentation is evident when:
children are programmed to swear loyalty to the flag then in their youth they are willing to die for their particular country,
which creates a mental concept in the whole of society that further creates a groove in individual Minds to stir emotions that further reinforce the whole vicious cycle,
without understanding who actually could be benefiting from a country’s wars, such as arms merchants, and
any counter-evidence is negated by the conditioned reflexivity of Thought.
even scientists fall prey to this, refusing to acknowledge significant evidence that is contrary to their purpose of not having their long cherished views being invalidated, for example:
The Newtonian mechanical model ruled the world for centuries, and thus it took decades of presented evidence to accept the probabilistic model of quantum physics.
Witness also in consciousness studies the extreme reluctance by those myopically following the man-is-a-machine model to accept many studies demonstrating obvious empirical observations in psychic phenomena.
Purpose-driven Thought without a view to integration is the more pernicious kind of conditioning, because we are forcing Thought to create an ever more fragmented and dystopian world view, and thus too is an Asura born.
Since Thought is of such enormous significance in our life, somewhere along the line Humans associated the entire Thought process with their core Identity.
These psychological conditionings result in a deep distortion of our Identity.
Our Identity is typically formed by observing the reactions (or measured responses) of those around us, and our own reactions (or measured responses) within, and from this dynamic interplay we get a sense of who we are psychologically.
Our psychological Identity is thus the accumulation of the Thoughts that we associate with who we are and can either provide clarity of perception or obfuscate our reality, depending on the level of conditioning we carry.
Our constructed Identity is so dearly held that it is hard to change
The whole of human existence stems from the deeply held notions of personal Identity fed by the inappropriate use of Thought, thus anything related to Identity is extremely hard to change, and even when we see its destructive outcomes we refuse to trace these to their origins and resolve them.
We are Thought obsessed with how we relate to others, the body, and everything that has been produced by Thought in the material domain.
The System of Thought has so possessed our current society that Thought is routinely applied in a fragmented manner, and we think being so possessed is perfectly normal.
The fragmentation and misalignment by Thought directly reflects in how we perceive our own Self.
When we have a deeply conditioned Identity applying any kind of logical thinking, no matter how seemingly sound, could still backfire as the Mind could start off with deep prejudice.
For example, a person of a particular color might be considered to not have a “soul”, and
being close to an animal
they therefore need to be civilized, and
best to do this early in their lives, so
take away their children to brainwash them -
which was a wide-spread practice in colonial times, world over.
All perfectly logical, but predicated on a deeply faulty assumption.
When Thought gets tied up so deeply with Identity it results in the most demeaning of situations, because the observer’s perspective becomes so "subjective" that people around become objectified, and relationships become transactional and thus meaningless.
Note that demeaning literally means we are stripping away the meaning in these situations, which is counter to the whole Intent/Purpose of Life itself!
It is no wonder then, that we are mentally agitated and feel out of control in stressful social situations.
Much of our personal consciousness, though, is buried deeply, and we are thus not fully aware of the impact of society on our Mind, and vice-versa.
Now that we have looked deeply at all aspects of Thought we can step back and look at the overall Mind.
We initially observed that one obvious characterization of the Mind is a collection of Thoughts.
The word collection signifies a repository like a memory bank, but this is no ordinary memory bank but one that acts as a very active mental machine.
Thus a deeper way to characterize Mind is that it is a System of Thought, where the Movement of conditioned Thought reinforces the interlinked parts to keep the whole mechanical System in place.
Thus the Mind is resistant to change.
Our exposition on the nature of the System of Thought is similar to that of Karma, and how well-formed Intent can become derailed without the guidance of Dharma or Purpose can cause conflict when not integrated in Yoga.
Thus too has Homo Sapiens created a rigid, mechanical world order, and our psychological conditioning of Thought prevents us from reaching our full potential, and often even becomes destructive.
The growth of material wealth due to Thought, and tying of Identity to Thought, has given undue importance to the power of Thought and has made the whole system of Thought almost unbreakable.
By this time we are surely yearning to throw away our self-imposed shackles with the Thought of how to break out of such a System.
But the paradox is that if we think about breaking this System with another Thought, as though from the outside, then that Thought too becomes a part of the System, with all its attendant issues.
For example, this “breaking-loose Thought”
could come from a space of emotional pain, which
brings a whole host of related Thoughts into the picture,
some of which could trigger a defensive reflex to prevent change
because we may not have the energy to deal with change.
So the Mind then creates some imagined counter Thought of emotional pleasure whose effects, like that of any addictive drug, wear off and leaves us even more depleted and worse off than before.
Thus we are stuck in a never ending pleasure-pain cycle, which perpetuates further conflict between what-is and what-wants-to-be but may-never-be properly sustained!
If it seems like Thought is an addiction, it is indeed so.
If it seems like we are possessed by the non-stop movement of Thought, we are.
To repeat a previous Thought, so to speak, Thought streams have taken on a life of their own, not under our conscious control.
There is the hint of a solution though, in the observation that Thought does have some Awareness of all this, obviously, since we have written so much about it using the functioning of Thought.
Awareness is a faculty which brings something into our field of perception, but usually it is for a fragment of our existence.
For example, when we are aware of some situation that is bothering us:
there is the situation “that” is being observed and there is “us” the observer also.
That is, the observer & the observed are being presented to us as fragments, and these fragments “stick out” at us so we become aware of them.
This is one level of awareness.
Then there is a qualitatively different level of awareness when we perceive the Wholeness of the Mind even though fragments may attempt to stick out, this fully integrated awareness is what we call as Yogic, or conscious, awareness.
With Yogic awareness, some aspect of the fragment is absorbed as an integrated facet of our Identity, and what does not resonate is no longer baggage that weighs us down.
Think of this Identity as a crystalline structure where some fragments were poking out, and many facets were dull or invisible, and the whole now shines forth as an integral aspect of who we are.
Thus the power of the Wholeness resolves the fragmentation into a facet of us that is connected to the Whole.
Our Identity is now modified to the extent of what we have managed to absorb - maybe it’s incremental like a change in habit or a total Transformation even.
When our Identity gets completely Transformed because of some huge aspect that we have absorbed this then is a psychological evolutionary moment.
To develop this skill of self Transformation is in fact the Purpose of the Mind Science of Yoga and prepares us for the ultimate in “free play” in the playground of Life .
Through the intelligent practice of Yoga, all conditionings from our previously unexamined consciousness become surfaced, de-energized in the light of our awareness, and then through sheer dint of intelligent practice resolve themselves into nothingness. Hopefully.
Thus from normal fragmented awareness we awake in fully conscious awareness.
At the very start we saw how the material Universe is likely composed of Meaning, Energy & Matter, and are mapped as follows:
Lokas are populated by psychic Beings and thus are abodes of Meaning.
Chakras are psychic hubs of Energy.
Bhūtas are the 5 primordial psychic elements of Matter.
Koshas, as we have seen earlier, are how all of this is put together in a Conscious Being such as Humans, or even the entire Universe when modeled as such.
These are to be viewed as meditation concepts to help us develop subtle perception skills by soaking into a well-thought framework in which to process all our perceptions.
As an analogue, this is parallel, but not identical, to Bohm's conscious physical Universe hypothesis of Meaning, Matter, Energy where:
Meaning is similar to Sat (the quality of i-am-ness, what does it "mean to me")
Matter is similar to Chit (the substance of Consciousness, awareness of what "matters")
Energy is similar to Ānanda (blissful feeling, creating an infinite "store of energy")
Brhman is the ultimate reality of all there is, a Being in Consciousness that starts, includes, and ends all conscious beings.
When Brhman is known then all else can be known.
We have not anthropomorphized Brhman, that is we have not viewed it in the form of a Human Being, or loaded it with human values of good/evil, for that would be religion.
If at any time the Thought strikes as to whether these are real, just ask the question whether we or the world around is actually real, or is our entire perception but a mental model.
Yoga helps us to keenly observe that the modern industrialized world, filled with our successful mechanistic creations, has rubbed off on our neuroplastic Minds and thus too our Life stories are stuck in some kind of automatic routine, diminishing true Creativity.
The existential question that arises in the Age of AI is thus - what differentiates humans from the Machine.
This mechanization of our Life story is the villain of our story in the Avatār of Yoga.
And as we know, any "good" story will usually setup the "villain" of the piece first, on the assumption that overcoming any kind of duality is always a worthy battle.